Breitbart also has an article about it:

ABC's Misleading Edit of Juror B29

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013 ... -Juror-B29

I am glad this is being pointed out and hope it ends up being pointed out in the mainstream media so more will hear about it.

But... as I recall... the MOM motion for sanctions went further... asked for some sort of judicial inquiry.

I assume that could go as far as some sort of discipline for BDLR (and others)... perhaps even criminal charges?

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Rumpole - thanks for all of the info. Gotta love how Ted just cuts right to the chase on things - why aren't they boycotting Chicago? Why is one life more valuable than thousands?

As for the SYG law, I think that is front and center by the schemers to try to make the foundation profitable, not that they care about the law per se, or are unaware how it will disproportionately harm those they claim to champion. It gives them a cause, like wanting "just an arrest" and "just a trial" and of course, "just a conviction of the top charge". Ok, that last one was paraphrased but the others weren't.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Does anyone know or have any idea how soon the issue of the sanctions will be heard?

That's my memory too but I understand what kbp is thinking of - the costs over the video denial. But there was also the phone stuff that was hidden, the IT guy testifying, etc., when Nelson called a halt.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Oh OK... then maybe if the Schemers named a price.... it would save a lot of time wasting and posturing and riots an' stuff


I have a Godfather scene as response to what ever price they put on their extortion.... I'll edit to add if I can find it


Found it

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

In a word......

NO


Sorry... if anybody can update "NO" please post

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Hi, SheStone!

I don't think it's scheduled yet; at least I haven't heard anything. Maybe they're waiting until after SZ's acquittal on the perjury charge? Focus on one thing at a time?

Or maybe getting their civil suits ready and filed before moving on to sanctions because they'll take a lot longer?

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Yes! Exactly! Tips from Al (may he be prosecuted fully and soon) Sharpton and his competitor, Jesse Jackson. It's my understanding that's exactly how they got their personal fortunes got their nonprofits funded.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

I think I may have misunderstood your post, sorry. You're saying it's not about the verdict, it's about the added costs tracking down the info. You may be right; I may be conflating that with something else where Nelson denied sanctions because there was no prejudice shown.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

The "winning or losing" is again not a factor, and the issue would still be in Nelson's court whatever the outcome might have been.

I've shared several times already, but intend to share many more times.

This story seems to have legs.

Sundance has a blog on this issue....

ABC Being Called Out for More Deceptive Editing, Splicing, of Interview… A Documented History of Intentional Manipulation
Posted on July 27, 2013 by sundance

Justice099 was one of the first Treepers yesterday, and again today, to point out that each version of the ABC interview with B29 is highly edited to put her recorded answers behind completely differing questions.

Now ABC is being called out by a far left of center media enterprise, Slate.Com. They too note not only the high editing, but also the construct of the edits themselves to make it appear that Juror B29 said things she absolutely did not say:

ABC has been shown time and time again to be biased in their use of new stories to highlight political agendas. Some of the most famous recent examples come from their coverage of the George Zimmerman case.
[....]
So gee, ya think ABC would deceptively edit a taped interview into talking points merely to sell a storyline that in actuality did not ever exist?


Ya think?


...more at link
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... ipulation/

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

ABC is owned by Disney. Ironic if ABC incites riot or boycott which discourages tourists from visiting Mickey Mouse.

Good morning, all!

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Mornin liesel.

This more about BGI than the GZ case, but the discussion is prompted by the case, so I thought y'all may be interested:

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Read more at Legal Insurrection.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Yay! A bit of good news!

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

This was hard to watch because Jasmine Cannick is suuuuuch a bigot. Her response "white people don't choose our civil rights leaders" and "white people have to engage in the right way" responses are pure garbage. No wonder nothing can get done with people like her.