CBS Clinton's Bull Shit News?
![fun :slap](./images/smilies/dreculsi1.gif)
Yeah I can see them throwing that out there.
Sounds like the trial is a shit show and that the foreman is a BLM SJW bully. I hope they get a mistrial.
All the other stuff is a lot of nonsense bad and sloppy. The foreman speaks for the jury that is why she was elected, it seems from what I read the judge asked once if the foreman spoke for the jury? It wasn't a verdict it was a question. Verdict poll the jury and demand the foreman state that she speaks for the jury.
The judge did clarify the law from what I read but refused to give an answer to a subjective question What is the difference between "passion" & "fear"
under the law. That is subjective answer once the definitions are before a juror. It sounds like a low IQ pool.
I can't find anywhere that it says that a judge cannot disclose which way the jury leans in an open courtroom. If you have a a 6/6 split that has or should have bearing on a judges decision compared to a 11/1 split.
It does seem to me that the judge has over stepped the Good Faith precedent but it is not the first time it has happened.
My thoughts are that the there will be a mistrial or an appeal as IMO the judge is acting in a way that is outside of his lawful boundaries in that he is putting undue duress on the holdout juror.
The jurors sound like a group of petulant little morons. "We're tired" We're hungry." Piss off donor job.