It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2788 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 136, 137, 138, 139, 140  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Optimistic wrote:
He's the sacrificial lamb. When Nelson grants the JOA, the story will be that Mantei messed up the argument. George started the fight? There are no marks on Trayvon, and RJ testified that Trayvon confronted George. Where is the evidence that George started it?

Who needs evidence when you have "judicial discretion"? Many don't believe the judge wants the responsibility or the backlash for ending this case now. She may surprise us, but she hasn't yet. Well, not in a big way like granting a JOA. I'm always surprised those rare times she sustains a defense objection or overrules the state.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
taurus wrote:
Urgent request help needed

I'm in a debate with a traybot.

Early this am on CTH I saw a media release about a meeting to be held on Tues July 9th to discuss the verdict in Sanford.

Now I can't find it over there.


Right here.

Protip: follow CTH, so that you get email notification of all new posts. Makes it easier to find old posts.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
seeing_eye wrote:
From all the evidence presented in this case, I don't think there was even a fight. It was a beating. I don't think George ever had a chance to even get a blow in.

I think the defense has proven that beyond a reasonable doubt. Oh wait... it was the state's case... so the state proved it beyond a reasonable doubt through the witnesses they called. ;)

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
LondoJowo wrote:
Weasel boy is a pathological liar, this argument is proof of such. He should be forced to sleep with Nelson and Corey for a month.......at the same time!!!!!! :29

Start a change.org petition if Rumpole won't order it! :Gslap

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Chip

I love you...want to go steady?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Can anyone imagine having a romantic encounter with any of the state prosecutors? Cripes even Guy has a sinister sneer. Bet he is in to pleasing himself and not the partner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
LMAO!!!!! MoM just blew away LIMPapa's argument on GZ pulling on the hoodie when he shot TM. :lol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56973
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
4:49 p.m.
O’Mara says he never got the chance to tell Martin he was with neighborhood watch because he was punched first.

“Show me how you have proven that there is no reasonable hypothesis of innocence,” O’Mara says.

He says the state wants the judge to believe Zimmerman made a sinister decision when he changed the location to meet with police, and it was precisely at the moment Zimmerman decided he was going “hunting.”

O’Mara says there’s no evidence to support that.

He says common sense should not be ignored in a judgment of acquittal.

“Yes he shot him, there’s no question about that,” O’Mara says, but adds there is no direct evidence of ill-will.

He says there’s no evidence that at the time he shot he was the initial aggressor.

The real focus is at the time of the shot if his fear was of great bodily injury.

“All he knew was that Trayvon Martin wasn’t stopping the attack after 40 seconds of screaming,” O’Mara says.

4:42 p.m.
“Trayvon Martin sucker punched my client,” O’Mara says.

He says his client waited an additional 40 seconds before taking action to stop the attack.

O’Mara says the Leisure case had three different stories to 911. He says the facts of the Zimmerman case are much different.

O’Mara points out the non-emergency call. He says they want the judge to take the beginnings of ill-will.

He says Serino and Singleton testified that they were changes they expected, about the inconsistencies from Zimmerman.

It’s merely what happens when someone has been through two traumatic events.

O’Mara says the totality of the circumstances must be considered.

He says the state should give him credit one way or the other, but the reality is he went through a traumatic time and is dealing with it just like the Martins.

O’Mara says the testimony of Mora and Surdyka said nothing about pursuit.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56973
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
flgirl543 wrote:

Wasn't most of what he said disputed by their own witnesses?

Closer to all of it, imo. I can't remember anything at all that wasn't. :46

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Oh look: Nelson speed-reading from a pre-determined decision denying the JOA.

Did anyone see that coming?

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
taurus wrote:
Chip

I love you...want to go steady?


I don't think my wife would take too kindly to that. :)

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Rumpole wrote:
Image

Prescient.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:52 pm
Posts: 45
So can her decision on this be an issue for the appeals court?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 7:06 pm
Posts: 16
Yeah, she didn't care what was argued, she was sending it to the jury. I don't know why I ever hope for a logical and correct decision from her, maybe I just got my hopes up from the Frye decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Put GZ's mom on the stand. It was GZ screaming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Poor George... Oh my... Did you see him? SMH

This is so unfair... so WRONG.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56973
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2788 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 136, 137, 138, 139, 140  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group