It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 10:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2788 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Importan question..

Did Bernie in addition to the ME say dead men can't stand?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:52 pm
Posts: 45
How can she deny this? MOM pointed out that other acquittals have had no where near as much reasonable doubt as this one, and he's right. So she will just blatantly go against these cases with even more reasonable doubt in hers?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:51 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56986
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
3:45 p.m.
O’Mara cites the Jenkins case because the facts are close. A man confronts another man making noise outside. The noise making man punches

Jenkins, and then Jenkins stabbed the other man with a knife, killing him. He used self-defense.

O’Mara says Jon Good’s testimony would support that Martin was the aggressor in that he mounted Zimmerman and refused the suggestion of Good to stop and continued the attack.

He says the case should be dismisses presently at judgment of acquittal.

He says if the court doesn’t agree that the case has been proven and decides that does exclude possibility of his client’s innocence, he thinks the evidence supports that he should win.

O’Mara moves on to the issue of ill-will and spite.

3:39 p.m.
He says this is a textbook case, but wouldn’t make it because it is obvious that the inference of non-guilt is much stronger than any suggested inference of guilt.

The court should consider and decide that Zimmerman, through his statements and witnesses, presented a case of prima facie defense, O’Mara says.

He says the state hasn’t given direct evidence that Zimmerman followed Martin after being told not to by dispatch.

O’Mara mentions Bahadoor’s testimony that someone moved from left to right.

He says aside from that there is nothing to support Zimmerman re-engaged Martin.

O’Mara mentions Jenna Lauer’s testimony supporting what Zimmerman has said. He says Surdyka’s testimony and the Manalos’ testimony also supports it.

He says Mora even supports Zimmerman’s statement to Singleton and Serino that he moved Martin’s hands and Dr. Bao’s testimony supports that the body could’ve have moved.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:55 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56986
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
3:53 p.m.
He says there’s no evidence to support he acted in ill-will, spite or hatred. He adds getting past the expletives, his interest in the community and the arrest of Emmanuel Burgess.

He mentions Judge Nelson was the sentencing judge in the Burgess case.

The other overriding necessity, O’Mara says, is the people know each other because ill-will, spite and hatred cannot be instantaneous.

He cites other cases he says were high-speed chase cases.

He cites another case where the defendant had a gun and the facts support he went and got it to arm himself after having an argument with two victims. He says the people attacked him and he shot and killed both of them.

O’Mara says that case showed an impulsive over reaction doesn’t show ill-will, spite or hatred.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:58 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56986
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Oh god, he comes that obnoxious Weasel Boy :95 :98


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Oh how fun: Mini-Me is giving the State's response to motion for JOA.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 7:06 pm
Posts: 16
Mantei? What the H E double hockey sticks? Isn't BDLR the prosecutor?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:02 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56986
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
POP goes the Weasel ... State's go to guy for BS

Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Mini-Me: "pointing a gun at someone's heart and pulling the trigger is prima facie evidence of an act indifferent to human life, with a depraved mind"

Wrong, Mini-Me. That act evinced extreme difference toward human life: the life of the person being subjected to a forcible felony and reasonably fearing imminent risk of life or great bodily harm.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Maybe they're going for the sympathy route by putting the poor little weasel in front of Judge Nelson.... :Gslap :lol :slap


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:26 am
Posts: 381
There was no evidence GZ grabbed TM. He is lying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:52 pm
Posts: 45
What dumb arguments the state is making. So the fact that he shot someone at all, even if in self defense shows that there is no other option than for the judge to drop his self defense hypothesis?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
SheStone wrote:
There was no evidence GZ grabbed TM. He is lying.


Mini-Me is begging the question.

The State has presented no evidence that Zimmerman pursued Martin, that Zimmerman confronted Martin, or that Zimmerman assaulted Martin. Thus, Mini-Me is arguing that facts not in evidence evince a depraved mind.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Didn't Nelson recently have a case of hers overturned or am I dreaming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:08 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56986
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Pop Goes The Weasel


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 7:06 pm
Posts: 16
Oh my lord, this is embarrassing. This is all they have? Direct evidence of a depraved mind is that he wanted to become a US marshal and hunt fugitives? Direct evidence was that he pulled the trigger? MOM was right, they have no direct proof of a depraved mind (to the legal standard, not what BDLR wishes it were), the circumstantial evidence is specious at best. If she refuses the JOA, her reasoning will be convoluted at best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Shouldn't Weasel Boy be presenting some legal precedences to back up his argument instead of BS comprised of speculation, conjecture, and innuendo???? :46


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Rumpole wrote:
Image

SheStone wrote:

My husband said he thought reposting this picture would be appropriate considering how the ME testimony went.

:Gslap :lol Thanks for reposting, SheStone. Your husband made an understatement, imo. :Gslap

Well done, Rumpole!

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 4:12 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 56986
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I get the intense feeling that Mantai should be sentenced to 20 years to life!

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2788 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 139 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group