Sorry, I stepped away, did Nelsom say TCH info not allowed to come in?

My husband said he thought reposting this picture would be appropriate considering how the ME testimony went.

Liesel - thanks for the welcome.

It doesn't seem anything can go smoothly in this case. His constant change in opinion can't be playing too well with people.

I can't believe he said that there wouldn't have been any movement. Anyone who has been close to someone who is dying knows that isn't true.

Pic is good....

A bit worried by the fact that you do what your husband tells you

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Yes. I think she said that one hundred times every time Mr. West asked a question. She was really starting to sound like a machine. The prosecutor was so afraid the ME was going to slip. It is unbelievable that she isn't allowing it in considering that this man changed his opinion on the effects plus just standard proof by other professionals.

Andrew Branca agrees with you!

I have no doubt there is a boat load of reasonable doubt.

Let's use the weather at Disney World, we know there F'in Goofy over there..........

Has Nelson ever been to Florida? It can rain hard, thunder, lightning, but two blocks away not get a drop.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Motion for Judgement of Acquittal?

3:18 p.m.
The exhibit is allowed into evidence with an additional wording. The next exhibit is objected to by the defense. It is about the weather information from a different location.

Guy responds that it is the closest weather station to the scene. He says its offered to show hour-by-hour analysis of the wind and rain conditions. He says it is within a few miles.

Judge Nelson asks for a distance.

She says she doesn't see prejudice with a weather report showing time-for-time the conditions, but her concern is how far away it is.

O'Mara says it is five or six miles.

Guy says it is the best information available.

The objection is overruled.

The state says they are going to rest.

3:11 p.m.
The state and defense address an issue regarding a timeline exhibit.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

I bet Nelson DENIES

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Yes, I recall that testimony and thought it was more an excuse for why his change of opinion wasn't disclosed to the defense. Sort of like, ; "I don't have to tell him anything, he's not my boss." as a reason why BDLR just found out today and wasn't sitting on this info to spring at trial.

But yes, I expect BDLR will be flapping his arms and yelling at Bao at his first opportunity.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

NO ONE, and I mean ZERO will take that bet, Rumpole.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

I suspect you're right but who knows she may actually decide to do the right thing.

MOM is putting on one hell of a motion..........go git em Mark!!!!!!!!

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

3:31 p.m.
O’Mara says there is no other reasonable hypothesis from the undisputed evidence other than his client was attacked by Trayvon Martin.

He says there’s no evidence to contra-indicated what his client says about being at the T-intersection and being hit in the face.

He says the violent act is sufficient for immediate response with deadly forces.

He says he didn’t but there is 40 seconds of screaming and receiving of additional injuries.

That injury and the ongoing nature of the injury supports the right of his client to reasonably believe he was in fear for his life, O’Mara says.

He says there is no state’s evidence that excludes that as a hypothesis of innocence.

The judgment of acquittal should be based on the citation of the Walker case, he says.

3:27 p.m.
O’Mara says there are a number of issues needing the court’s attention.

He says there is a standard of acquittal regarding his client. He asks the court to determine if there is direct evidence showing ill-will or spite.

He says the circumstantial evidence still must negate any possibility of evidence by his client.

O’Mara cites a case involving circumstantial evidence.

He says the context of the non-emergency call doesn’t show ill-will or spite and there is no direct evidence that supports it.

O’Mara says he’s not sure what the state’s case is, but if they were trying to say he was a frustrated neighborhood watch “cop-wannabe” they have no direct evidence to show that.

He says they’ve show his client was frustrated by people that have gotten away.

He says circumstantial evidence has to negate any possibility of innocence.

He says all of the evidence must be looked at and there is an enormous amount of evidence his client acted in self-defense.

O’Mara mentions the testimony of Jahvaris and Sybrina Fulton, but that it must be taken into context of other evidence that existed that night.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light