Starting a new thread...

It helps when searching previous posts to limit threads to 1000 or so posts

Previous Threads:

George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Discussion #1
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=133

George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Discussion #2
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=584

George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Discussion #3
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=767

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

More exculpatory evidence, inconsistent with later versions of the W8 story. Is this the 1st disclosure of this exculpatory evidence to the defense?

She kind of lost me when she said of Mr. Martin - "He be tired". LOL

Her whole story is contrived.

God, is that woman's senseless program still on? I thought I heard it had been cancelled.

She is one of the worst news person I have seen in a long time. She has always been just a "walking cliche" and usually just parrots talking points. Very little understanding in any of her interviews.

Answering my own post...I get it...

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0313/st ... dacted.pdf

In regards to the letter. It is listed in here and the Defense received on March 15th and again on March 27th when the 13th Doc Dump was concluded.

And disclosed to the defense via Discovery Supplement the Thirteenth, on 27 March 2013: the very same day that final witness lists were due, per court order.

Is it usual for the State still to be disclosing discovery at a date so late as to make it impossible to consider such discovery, evaluate it, and determine whether the discovery compels the need for additional witnesses?

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

Chip, according to the discovery packet, the Defense first got the letter on March 15th, 2012.

Not usual, but I have seen it happen, particularly in high profile cases where a lot is at stake. It is prosecutorial hardball tactic. There is a lot at stake here. The advent of the internet and email has somewhat curbed such practice. Years ago when the only alternatives were FedEx or a messenger service, it was more egregious.

The letter wasn't the only thing in the 13th discovery supplement...

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

And of course, any related complaint will be met with the response: I don't see anything insurmountable.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

Can't the defense appeal this latest ruling regarding Crump to an appeals court? That's what they did to get rid of the first judge.

Something weird is happening.. I am TRYING to fix it

I think.....

Server company has stuffed up in a way that has happened before....

when they migrated to a new server... RT was for a time operating in two locations.. two separate copies of the site... posts done on the "Old site" are now lost... very confusing...

Please dont continue to post about missing posts etc... nothing I can do about it.


ASSUMING - this is now the New server location for RT

Posts done recently may have been on old server.. now lost... sorry

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Reminder


As well as this DAILY discussion thread about the GZ case... there is also

DAILY DAFT POSTS FROM JUSTARSE QUEST
viewtopic.php?f=45&t=822&p=28884#p28884



If only Trayvon had kept his hands in his pockets, none of this would have happened.

[/quote]

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

There was a lot lost in the server migration......

It's Good Friday.... Happy Easter.....

Zimmerman: The Scheme Team - At The Hop

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Am I mistaken, or does the case detail report say that Judge Nelson issued an order extending the deadline to file final witness lists?

_________________
Figures never lie, but liars sometime figure.

What case detail report, where?

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Seminole County Clerk of Court

http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDo ... 2CF001083A

Recent Entries:

MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE
03/28/2013... FREE... DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO NON-PARTY BENJAMIN L. CRUMP, ESQ'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION
03/28/2013... FREE... TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
03/27/2013... ORFF... ORDER EXTENDING WITNESS LIST DISCLOSURE TIMELINE
03/26/2013... MOTN.. OFFICE FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
03/26/2013... MOTN... DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINS STATE ATTORNEY'S
03/26/2013... DDIS... DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
03/25/2013... MOTN... OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS
03/25/2013... MOTN... DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINS STATE ATTORNEY'S

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

I see it listed... well spotted LJP

I guess it just means what it says?,,,,,, but who knows with this case?

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

The Orlando Sentinel has another article up about this case and about the escalating hostility: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/loc ... 2497.story

My favorite bit is this:



Drunk and unprofessional.