So when I was looking around Realty Chatter I found this link which has transcript from W8 and what ABC recorded. Sorry if someone posted this already!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/ ... nd_dj.html

Reminder


As well as this DAILY discussion thread about the GZ case... there is also

DAILY DAFT POSTS FROM JUSTARSE QUEST
viewtopic.php?f=45&t=822&p=34056#p34055

It's getting hard to find a Daily Daft at Justarse Quest.... the place is almost dead.

The JQ Sewer has drained and oozed into the Crime Watchers Septic tank... the shit has settled there as a brown sludge... most of your favourite cretins are there.... so never fear.... the laughs will still keep coming

Not sure how long it will last though.. Baker is going to be mighty pissed when she finds out her "loyal" members (even Super Mods) are posting at another forum... "after all she has done for them" ....they are even actively trying to recruit (seduce) cretins from the Sewer into the septic tank.

DESPITE what she says publicly ... Baker is a vindictive bitch who BANS people for associations with other forums....

Watch this space.... I predict history is about to repeat itself... just as we had the infamous "taking out the trash" when Tricia at WS lanced a boil, ejecting the pus that coagulated into JQ...

... so we may well see JQ's Madam Owner getting rid of her own ass boil... when she squeezes out her own disloyal pus....

.... it will no doubt coagulate into the future Crime Watchers "Forum"


After all..... JQ = WS (lite)

DAILY DAFT POSTS FROM JUSTARSE QUEST
viewtopic.php?f=45&t=822&p=34083#p34055



If only Trayvon had kept his hands in his pockets, none of this would have happened.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Not sure if this was posted.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/loc ... 6767.story

Thanks Taurus.

The link and pic has been discussed.

MOM and his bff Crump

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

I see a lot of people are upset/disturbed by the picture of MOM & Crump. I don't make much of it, I consider it along the lines of MOM "killing him with kindness". If you look at Obama/Romney photos you will see some of the same thing.

I think MOM held no punches in the question and answer session last night and got his point across. On the other hand, Crump continued with his BS. He says none of TM's social media had anything to do with his demise, I say it has everything to do with it...it gave a clear picture of who TM was at the time of his death. And he wants to depose MOM if he's required to submit to a deposition...what a joke! Why bring up the paypal account, perhaps to get the stink off of himself. Exactly what does anything having to do with GZ's bond have to do with the case at hand? Much of what he said can be proven to be lies just by looking at past interviews he gave...guess he doesn't care much for the truth.

Funny thing about that 2 million plus petition. I signed some petitions on that site before this case. When I received a thank you for signing the TM petition, which I didn't sign, I complained and received a reply stating: Occasionally, when a promising campaign starts to gain momentum, we will offer additional support to the petition creator to help move it forward. When I questioned that, I was told the thank you was sent in error. I then closed my account. I wonder how many of those two million were "to help move it forward".

Here is the link to the raw video including the Q & A.
http://www.wftv.com/videos/news/raw-mar ... rge/vzQ4f/

I think that MOM did very well. He brought up the salient points of discovery and his frustration at getting to it. I liked the way he addressed the BDLR rant. He is very understated and eloquent. Plus he told the reporters to start asking questions themselves. Basically telling them to do their jobs.

Crump (on evidence): "We have seen most of it. The State and the Defense has it all."

Really? What right does he have to be reviewing any additional evidence that has not been released in compliance with the Sunshine Law in Florida? Did the State feed him enough information on this case, outside of the Discovery so far, that he was able to get his settlement for SF and the Estate of Trayvon Martin? Did he use his connections w/ Biondi and Corey to further that along? He needs to get paid by the State, IMO, since he does consider himself as part of the Prosecution Team.

And obviously the Defense has not gotten everything or they wouldn't have to keep asking for it by Motion after Motion. Doesn't it ever seem odd to reporters that after a Motion to Compel, the State chokes up some more evidence just prior to the Hearing regarding that motion? Including the 12th(?) that was basically dropped on the podium at the start of a Hearing?

I agree with you. It was like a slap in the face when I heard Crump say that. How dare he make such a stupid, untrue statement anyway. Surely those reporters would know something is wrong with it because MOM wouldn't still be asking for the evidence if he already has it all.

Surely you are not forgetting, Deb, that Crump is perfectly entitled to know everything concerning this case, as Judge Nelson has proclaimed him to be "opposing counsel".......

Let me join you.

From Crump/Parks website. Crump is in the Million Dollar Club -

"The work has been profitable. Crump was inducted three years ago into the Multi-Million Dollar Advocacy Forum for winning more than 20 verdicts and settlements of $1 million or more each.

“My biggest regret is my biggest victory: Martin’s case,” Crump said.

“His family got something, but I will go to my grave feeling the loss of trust in the system. We saw a little black boy die at the hands of adults who got away.”

Crump says he wants to make sure it doesn’t happen again with Trayvon’s case."

OMG! Crump has his whole reputation riding on this case - no wonder he made up DeeDee.

I find that deeply disturbing, flgirl543. Did they admit what form this "additional support" takes? It would appear from the context that it involves putting someone's name on a petition that they didn't, in fact, sign. Isn't that illegal? There must be some sort of body that governs these "petition" sites, to whom a complaint could be made. Have you tried to draw this to the attention of the public? What website is it?

This is horrible. He is willing to ruin an innocent man's life. He should be put under the jail as my mother used to say.

What Crump, the Schemers and the Cretinous Traybots say.. only makes any sense in the context of the original FALSE narrative.

Any rational, thinking observer can see that narrative was a LIE.

The Julison/Crump "Raciss" narrative collapsed almost on day one. ("White Hispanic" indeed) And media manipulations of audio to give a FALSE impression are exposed. The FBI investigated and dismissed charges that GZ was a racist. DD is a hot mess and getting worse. "Little boy-chile" Trayvon turns out to be a troubled and violent young thug... etc..... on and on... the narrative is false. To persist with it and believe it, suggests that person is delusional, with psychological issues. Those who persist with the narrative (knowing it is false) to further their own agenda (political and/or financial) are truly evil people.... who need to be held accountable.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

My god! He can't even contain his glee!

Oh...."little black boy..." ???????

So he's saying that the Martins did get $1 million or more. Well, that sure spoiled my day.



Gee, how many things are wrong with that sentence? "We saw"? That's not what the witnesses say. "A little black boy"? How 'bout a black teenage hoodlum over 6' tall? "At the hands of adults"? I guess he's been hanging around JQ and similar cesspits, if he thinks there was more than one adult who had a hand in TM's death. Unless we want to count the parents whose disinterest led to TM being in that place at that time in those circumstances. And hey Crump, let's not forget the cockatoo! "Who got away"? Um, would that be the man who, after being attacked and beaten for no reason, was then taken into custody, repeatedly questioned, released b/c there were no grounds for his arrest, and then forced to spend the next year in hiding b/c of the likes of scum like Crumb? The man whose life has been ruined by lying trash b/c his skin is the wrong colour?

I think I gotta go lie down till my blood pressure subsides...

They actually said they send out an alert pointing to the petition as something you might be interested in signing. I said that didn't explain how the petition was signed in my name. I received this reply: We are truly sorry you received an email update on the Trayvon Martin petition when you did not sign it; indeed, this was an error. The message was sent by a tool managed by the internal Change.org team, and one of the filters on the recipient selections failed, which resulted in the email being sent to some non-signers. Please be assured that your email address has not been shared. I called BS and said I closed my account and would advise others to do the same. Their response...sorry...bye...

Were you able to view the petition to ascertain whether your name was on there?

I agree, total BS on their part.

It's referring to the Martin Anderson case. Not the Trayvon Martin case. Crump isn't mentioned in the Wikipedia page for some reason, but he was the lead attorney.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Anderson_case

I challenge anyone to provide proof that Crump has EVER tried a case in a courtroom. Not attorneys from his firm - HIM. Where you know he has to get up and serve as lead counsel on a case. After watching that "social media" video ... I just said ... no way.

Oh, of course! Thanks, RFB. I didn't follow that case closely (I was abroad at the time) and have never followed Crump's career (such as it is) at all.