Random Topics
http://randomtopics.org/

WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)
http://randomtopics.org/viewtopic.php?f=146&t=1109
Page 2 of 2

Author:  Rumpole [ Sun Jul 27, 2014 7:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T renewsit...

Renisha McBride could have gone to her Aunt's House less than one block away

Kay Lumpkin Shell is Renisha's great Aunt. She lives at 7288 Bramell. The wreck happened on the same street, about 10 houses down at 7233 Bramell.

Author:  Rumpole [ Sun Jul 27, 2014 8:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

Google Map - Wafer/McBride Case

I have created an interactive Google map showing key locations.

WALK the scene with "Street View"

http://goo.gl/maps/yWyYZ

Screen shot (not interactive)
Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

Davonta Bynes House MkII??


Author:  Rumpole [ Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)


Author:  Rumpole [ Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

Witnesses and Testimony in the Renisha McBride Murder Trial

STATE WITNESSES

Day 1 of Trial

Witness #1 – Monica McBride
Image

Witness #2 – Amber Jenkins
Image

Witness #3 – Carmen Beasley
Image

Witness #4 – Ruben Gonzalez
Image



Day 2 of Trial

Witness #5 – Rory McManmon
Image

Witness #6 – Syphonia Page
Image

Witness #7 – Paris Pace
Image

Witness #8 – Valentine Peppers
Image

Witness #9 – Tim Zawacki
Image

Witness #10 – Mark Parrinello
Image



Day 3 of the Trial

Witness #11 – Davonta Bynes
Image

Witness #12 – Ray Murad
Image

Witness #13 – Kevin Lucidi
Image

Witness #14 – Wade Higgason
Image

Witness #15 – Stan Brue
Image

Witness #16 – Cyndi Maxwell
Image

Witness #17 – Jennifer Rizk
Image

Witness #18 – Alison Riviera-Papillo
Image

Witness #19 – Heather Vitta
Image



Day 4 of Trial

Witness #20 – James Bivens Jr.
Image

Witness #21- Shawn Kolonich
Image

Witness #22 – Stephen Gurka
Image

The prosecution recalls Witness #1 – Monica McBride
Image

Witness #23 – Kilak Kesha
Image

:::The Prosecution Rests:::

Defense asks for a directed verdict of not guilty - DENIED by Judge Hathaway



DEFENSE WITNESSES

Defense Witness #1 – Werner Spitz
Image

Defense Witness #2 – David Balash
Image

Defense Witness #3 – Theodore Wafer (Defendant)
Image


.......to be updated

...summary details at link
https://thetrialfile.wordpress.com/2014 ... ial-recap/

Author:  Rumpole [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T renewsit

Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)


Author:  Rumpole [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T renewsit....

This interactive map seems to show crimes reated to Detroit City.. so there would be many more additional ones from Suburban Police Depts. (such as Dearborn Heights). It gives some idea of crime in the area that would perhaps have been a factor in Wafer's fear of an intruder.

Interactive map: Major crimes in Detroit

UPDATE, March 1, 2014: This map is no longer being updated due to the Detroit Police Department's cessation of crime summary reports.

The Detroit News will show where the city's deadliest crimes take place. Click on a marker to see the details of all major homicides and shootings reported by the Detroit Police Department since May 1, 2012. The addresses are not specific, but rather refer to the block or intersection where the crime occurred. Check back often to see the latest crime locations.

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/9999 ... z38u8Q2IYS

Screenshot (not interactive)
Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T Mimi....

A fixed AC unit in Wafer's backyard

Image


RM boot with sock showing

Image


RM Boots in evidence

Image



Wafer's recliner chair

Image


Porch door.
Officer maintains that the top part was "not fully in the track" but isn't conceding that the bottom part had fallen out of the bottom track.

Image


The gun used Wafer as photog by police inside the.ft door

Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

Added BP Service Station to Map
Mentioned in trial, significance unknown as yet

http://goo.gl/maps/7qi7W

Screenshot(not interactive)
Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T The Trial File...

Renisha closer to her real age, rather than the (iconic) blown up 12yr old face.

Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 2:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T The Trial File
https://thetrialfile.wordpress.com/

Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime Second-degree Murder
Spoiler:
Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime Second-degree Murder

CJI2d 16.5 Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime
Second-degree Murder

(1) [The defendant is charged with the crime of / You may also consider the lesser charge of] second-degree murder. To prove this charge, the prosecutor must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(2) First, that the defendant caused the death of [name deceased], that is, that [name deceased] died as a result of [state alleged act causing death].

(3) Second, that the defendant had one of these three states of mind: [he / she] intended to kill, or [he / she] intended to do great bodily harm to [name deceased], or [he / she] knowingly created a very high risk of death or great bodily harm knowing that death or such harm would be the likely result of [his / her] actions.[FN 3]

[(4) Third, that the killing was not justified, excused, or done under circumstances that reduce it to a lesser crime.]

Penalty under Michigan Codified Law (Statutory law)

750.317 Second degree murder; penalty.
Sec. 317.

Second degree murder—All other kinds of murder shall be murder of the second degree, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for life, or any term of years, in the discretion of the court trying the same.


Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime (Manslaughter)
Spoiler:
Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime (Manslaughter)

CJI2d 16.8 Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime

Voluntary Manslaughter

(1) [The defendant is charged with the crime of / You may also consider the lesser charge of] voluntary manslaughter. To prove this charge, the prosecutor must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(2) First, that the defendant caused the death of [name deceased], that is, that [name deceased] died as a result of [state alleged act causing death].

(3) Second, that the defendant had one of these three states of mind: [he / she] intended to kill, or [he / she] intended to do great bodily harm to [name deceased], or [he / she] knowingly created a very high risk of death or great bodily harm knowing that death or such harm would be the likely result of [his / her] actions.

[(4) Third, that the defendant caused the death without lawful excuse or justification.]

Penalty under Michigan Codified Law (Statutory law)

750.321 Manslaughter.
Sec. 321.

Manslaughter—Any person who shall commit the crime of manslaughter shall be guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, not more than 15 years or by fine of not more than $7,500 dollars, or both, at the discretion of the court.


Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Possession of Firearm at Time of Commission or Attempted Commission of Felony
Spoiler:
Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Possession of Firearm at Time of Commission or Attempted Commission of Felony

CJI2d 11.34 Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Elements of the Crime

Possession of Firearm at Time of Commission or Attempted Commission of Felony

(Felony Firearm)

(1) The defendant is also charged with the separate crime of possessing a firearm at the time [he / she] committed [or attempted to commit] the crime of __________.

(2) To prove this charge, the prosecutor must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(3) First, that the defendant committed [or attempted to commit] the crime of __________, which has been defined for you. It is not necessary, however, that the defendant be convicted of that crime.

(4) Second, that at the time the defendant committed [or attempted to commit] that crime [he / she] knowingly carried or possessed a firearm.

[Use any of the following paragraphs when factually appropriate:]

[(5) This charge includes possession of a firearm during either a completed crime or an attempted crime. An attempt has two elements. First, the defendant must have intended to commit the crime of __________. Second, the defendant must have taken some action toward committing the alleged crime, but failed to complete the crime. It is not enough to prove that the defendant made preparations for committing the crime. Things like planning the crime or arranging how it will be committed are just preparations; they do not qualify as an attempt. In order to qualify as an attempt, the action must go beyond mere preparation, to the point where the crime would have been completed if it had not been interrupted by outside circumstances. To qualify as an attempt, the act must clearly and directly be related to the crime the defendant is charged with attempting and not some other objective.]

[(6) It does not matter whether or not the gun was loaded.]

[(7) A firearm includes any weapon from which a dangerous object can be shot or propelled by the use of explosives, gas, or air.]

[(8) A pistol is a firearm.]

[(9) A firearm does not include smooth bore rifles or handguns designed and manufactured exclusively for shooting BBs not exceeding .177 caliber by means of spring, gas, or air.]

Penalty under Michigan Codified Law (Statutory law)

750.227b Carrying or possessing firearm when committing or attempting to commit felony; “law enforcement officer” defined.

(1) A person who carries or has in his or her possession a firearm when he or she commits or attempts to commit a felony, except a violation of section 223, section 227, 227a or 230, is guilty of a felony, and shall be imprisoned for 2 years. Upon a second conviction under this section, the person shall be imprisoned for 5 years. Upon a third or subsequent conviction under this subsection, the person shall be imprisoned for 10 years.

(2) A term of imprisonment prescribed by this section is in addition to the sentence imposed for the conviction of the felony or the attempt to commit the felony, and shall be served consecutively with and preceding any term of imprisonment imposed for the conviction of the felony or attempt to commit the felony.

(3) A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall not be suspended. The person subject to the sentence mandated by this section is not eligible for parole or probation during the mandatory term imposed pursuant to subsection (1).

(4) This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer who is authorized to carry a firearm while in the official performance of his or her duties, and who is in the performance of those duties. As used in this subsection, “law enforcement officer” means a person who is regularly employed as a member of a duly authorized police agency or other organization of the United States, this state, or a city, county, township, or village of this state, and who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and the enforcement of the general criminal laws of this state.


Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions – Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense
Spoiler:
Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

Burden of Proof

(Explaining Reasonable Doubt for Jurors)

This is a great illustration of BURDEN the State SHOULD have in our system of justice

Image

Author:  Rumpole [ Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WAFER / McBRIDE REFERENCE (No Discussion)

H/T Nettles...

Michigan Homicide Laws

http://nesselandkessellaw.com/homicide/

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/